Original Article
Beyond the limits of
traditional diagnostics: the role of artificial intelligence in analyzing
multimodal data for rapid virus detection
Más allá de los límites
del diagnóstico tradicional: el papel de la inteligencia artificial en el
análisis de datos multimodales para la detección rápida de virus
Ali Adel Dawood1* ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8988-5957
Ahmed Mohammed Hayawi2 ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6760-4699
1 Department
of Anatomy, Al-Batool College of Medicine, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.
2 Department
of Microbiology, College of Medicine, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq
Corresponding author: aad@uomosul.edu.iq
ABSTRACT
Accurate and rapid
diagnosis of viral infections is critical for effective public health
responses. This article reviews traditional diagnostic methods including viral
culture, PCR, and serological assays highlighting their limitations in
scalability, speed, and adaptability to emerging outbreaks. In contrast,
artificial intelligence offers transformative capabilities in analyzing medical
images, genomic sequences, and multimodal data with unprecedented precision. The novel solutions
presented in this article include convolutional neural networks in radiological
imaging, transformer-based neural nets in genome biology, and integrated
solutions to bringing clinical, molecular, and imaging data together. The arising
methods such as single-molecule imaging through deep learning and artificial
intelligence-based low-resource diagnostic methods are also discussed. A
comparative analysis highlights the benefits of artificial intelligence
compared to traditional methods in the areas of efficiency, scalability and
clinical integration, and explore the issues of data quality, algorithmic bias
and regulatory compliance. Finally, the article draws conclusions detailing its
future directions, protein language models, federated learning and portable
diagnostic platforms. At the end, the article recommends applications of hybrid
diagnostic systems, combining conventional approaches with the artificial
intelligence-driven technologies, and notes that interpretable algorithms and
the cross-industry developmental efforts between artificial intelligence and
health professionals, will be necessary to address emerging viral challenges.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; convolutional neural networks; deep learning;
virus.
RESUMEN
El diagnóstico preciso y rápido de las infecciones virales es
fundamental para que las respuestas de salud pública sean eficaces. Este
artículo revisa los métodos de diagnóstico tradicionales, incluidos el cultivo
viral, la PCR y los ensayos serológicos, y destaca sus limitaciones en cuanto a
escalabilidad, rapidez y adaptabilidad a los brotes emergentes. Por el
contrario, la inteligencia artificial ofrece capacidades transformadoras en el
análisis de imágenes médicas, secuencias genómicas y datos multimodales con una
precisión sin precedentes. Las novedosas soluciones que se presentan en este
artículo incluyen redes neuronales convolucionales en imágenes radiológicas,
redes neuronales basadas en transformadores en biología genómica y soluciones
integradas para reunir datos clínicos, moleculares y de imágenes. También se
analizan los métodos emergentes, como la obtención de imágenes de moléculas
individuales mediante el aprendizaje profundo y los métodos de diagnóstico
basados en la inteligencia artificial con pocos recursos. Un análisis
comparativo destaca las ventajas de la inteligencia artificial en comparación
con los métodos tradicionales en las áreas de eficiencia, escalabilidad e
integración clínica, y explora las cuestiones de la calidad de los datos, el
sesgo algorítmico y el cumplimiento normativo. Por último, el artículo extrae conclusiones en las
que detalla sus orientaciones futuras, los modelos lingüísticos basados en
proteínas, el aprendizaje federado y las plataformas de diagnóstico portátiles.
Al final, el artículo recomienda la aplicación de sistemas de diagnóstico
híbridos, que combinen los enfoques convencionales con las tecnologías basadas
en la inteligencia artificial, y señala que serán necesarios algoritmos
interpretables y esfuerzos de desarrollo intersectoriales entre la inteligencia
artificial y los profesionales de la salud para hacer frente a los nuevos retos
virales.
Palabras claves: inteligencia artificial; redes neuronales convolucionales;
aprendizaje profundo; virus.
Received: 4 de septiembre de 2025
Accepted: 17 de febrero de 2026
Introduction
Early
detection and proper identification of viral infections is one of the pillars
of successful public health response and clinical care. Conventional forms of
diagnosis like viral culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and serological
testing are long term seasoned standards used in virology laboratories. These
methods, although reliable, can be costly in terms of resources such as
equipment, trained manpower, and time consuming, thus they can be cumbersome
during an outbreak or in resource-poor environment.(1)
Artificial
intelligence (AI) is a relatively recent technology that has found its
application in the field of biomedical diagnostics, providing it with a new
solution to the problem of the existing methods. Computationally intensive problems,
such as medical image analytics, genomic sequencing, and clinical metadata, are
capable of being analyzed with extreme speed and accuracy due to AI. Such
technologies not only proved useful in finding the viral pathogens, but also in
forecasting their infective behavior, their resistance and their epidemiology.(2)
This
article aims to explore the latest advancements in AI-based viral diagnostics
and compare them with traditional approaches across multiple dimensions,
including accuracy, scalability, cost-effectiveness, and clinical
applicability. It provides a thematic narrative overview of recent AI
applications, integrating peer-reviewed findings and emerging technologies
across imaging, genomics, and clinical deployment.
Traditional
methods for viral diagnosis: foundations and limitations
Traditional
methods of diagnosis have taken years to become the fundamental aspects of
clinical virology. The viral culture is one of the first choices which entails
the isolation and growth of a live virus in cells. While it gives conclusive
identification and subsequent phenotypic studies, it is too slow and may
require days or weeks to complete and requires biosafety-level laboratory
facilities. It is not very practical in urgent diagnostics or mass screening.(3)
PCR
revolutionized the detection of viruses, by enabling the amplification of
specific nucleic acids. Its
high sensitivity and specificity, has made it a popular method to detect a
broad range of viruses such as HIV, influenza and SARS-CoV-2. However, PCR has
its limitations though. It is very much dependent on reagents, the availability
of thermal cyclers, and competence of skilled technicians. Further falsely
negative results could be obtained because of the sampling error or low viral
loads at the beginning of infections.(4)
Antibodies
or antigens can be detected using serological assays, e.g. enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assays (ELISA). These tests are useful to diagnose
retrospectively and to monitor epidemiologically, but less useful in the acute
phase of infection concerning the formation of antibodies. Rapid lateral flow
assays have been increasingly used during the COVID-19 pandemic as they are
fast and easy to use. However, in most cases, they are not sensitive enough and
can lead to false-negative results in asymptomatic or minimally-loaded cases.(5)
Although
they have been shown to be useful, traditional methods have been found to be
limited in these aspects: scalability, turnaround time, and suitability to new
pathogens. Such restrictions highlight the necessity of complementary
technology and solutions capable of streamlining the diagnostic workflows
especially during an outbreak or in a decentralized environment.(1)
AI-based
viral diagnosis: techniques and innovations
The
field of viral diagnostics has undergone a paradigm shift with the emergence of
data driven, scalable and highly dynamic tools powered by AI. In comparison to
the traditional methods that are based on the biochemical reactions or are
interpreted manually, AI systems can work with clinical, genomic, and imaging
data and detect a viral infection with a great speed and accuracy. In outbreak
cases, the systems are especially useful because a quick screening and early
detection is a prime concern in outbreak control response.(5)
The
area in which the application of AI in virology is most noticeable is the use
of deep learning models, mainly convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to analyze
medical images like chest X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans. In the
COVID-19 era, some of the studies have shown that AI models can perform the
differentiation of viral pneumonia and alternative respiratory diseases with
the diagnostic precision near to that of professional radiologists. These
models trained on thousands of annotated images and could provide its outputs
in a few seconds, which made them appropriate to be used on point-of-care devices.(2,6)
In
addition to imaging, AI has also been utilized in analysis of genomic data.
Sequencing can be used to detect viral mutations, categorize different strains
and predict drug resistance through machine learning algorithms of viral RNA
sequences. As another example, SARS-CoV-2 variants have been tracked with
recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and transformer-based models in order to
project their epidemiological impact. These have made it possible to monitor
the virus in real time and also assist in the design of a vaccine as they
identify regions that are conserved and not conserved within viral genomes.(7)
Single-particle
imaging with the deep learning technique is another budding method of imaging.
Researchers at American Chemical Society (ACS) Nano
have created a platform that can detect and characterize viruses within a few
minutes through the analysis of their light, but unlike similar platforms, it
can also identify an infected sample using AI algorithms. This method avoids
requirements of amplification or labelling and can discriminate between several
types of viruses during a single experiment.(8)
The
impact of multimodal data integration has been significant, allowing for the
combination of data from tests, laboratory results, imaging, and
epidemiological studies into a comprehensive overview of potential diagnoses.
Based on this approach, end-to-end AI systems have been designed to classify
respiratory diseases and directly detect COVID-19 at the point-of-care,
providing a conceptual model of what future diagnostic systems should be like,
i.e., autonomous and adaptive.(9)
Despite
these advances, challenges remain. AI models require large, high-quality
datasets for training, and their performance can degrade when applied to new
populations or data sources. Moreover, interpretability and regulatory approval
are ongoing concerns, especially in clinical settings where transparency is essential.(2)
AI-driven
viral diagnosis pipeline
Viral
diagnostics is being transformed through the use of IA to analyze ad hoc data
much faster. The diagnostic pipeline starts with the recording of multimodal
data or inputs such as X-rays (i.e. chest X-rays), RNA viral sequences,
structured clinical documents among others. Such data are preprocessed through
denoising, normalization, and feature encoding to ensure compatibility across modalities.(5)
Then,
a more advanced deep neural network architecture will be used CNNs over images
to extract features, transformer-based models to analyze sequences, and
multimodal fusion networks to combine various data streams. Such models are
trained to identify viral signatures, classify the type of infection and
predict the severity of infection.(10)
A
graphical overview of this workflow is provided in Figure 1, which depicts the
AI-based workflow of the viral diagnosis pipeline that combines multimodal
biomedical inputs, preprocessing steps, domain-specific deep learning models,
and clinically actionable outputs.
The
final stage involves generating diagnostic outputs, including virus
identification, severity grading, and personalized treatment recommendations.
This AI-driven approach enhances diagnostic precision, reduces time-to-result,
and supports evidence-based clinical decision-making.
Fig.
1. Viral diagnosis pipeline based on artificial intelligence. The
schematic diagram of a viral diagnostics pipeline based on artificial
intelligence. In the multimodal biomedical input that the system combines,
there are, among others, the following: the chest radiographs, the RNA
sequences of the virus, and the structured clinical records of the patient that
are processed by the system through the denoising, normalization, and feature
encoding steps. Specialized deep learning architectures are used: for image
recognition Convolutional Neural Network architecture, sequence recognition
with Transformer based architecture and integrating learning with multimodal
fusion networks. The pipeline products are the identification of virus,
severity grading, and individualized treatment recommendations, which help to
make personalized actions and support the quick and evidence-based
clinical decision-making.
Clinical
applications of AI in viral diagnostics
The application of AI in virus diagnostics has transitioned from
theoretical concepts to real-world implementation. The use of AI-driven
software in the hospital setting has become commonplace, thus making it easy to
interpret the data contained in radiographic images, laboratory results, and
symptoms associated with a patient. One notable example is the CNN, which has
demonstrated high accuracy in determining whether a patient has COVID-19 based
on chest X-rays. In some cases, the accuracy of CNN has surpassed that of
traditional radiologists, particularly in time-sensitive analyses.(11)
In addition, AI-based tools (e.g., BioMind and
InferRead) have been successfully tested in
multicenter studies that demonstrate their potential for diagnosing respiratory
infections with real-time support and subsequent decrease in diagnosis
turnaround times. By improving the precision of care and alleviating the burden
on healthcare experts, these tools become imperative during outbreaks.(12)
Nevertheless, there are obstacles to clinical use that AI, although
promising, has to cover, namely, interoperability, data privacy, and approval
of use. To find solutions to these concerns becomes a necessity to integrate
itself stable into routine diagnostics.(13)
AI in
viral mutation analysis and development
AI
plays a crucial role in tracking viral mutations and vaccine development.
Machine learning algorithms have the ability to analyze large genomic data sets
to determine mutation hotspots, extrapolate antigenic drift and model immune
escape. Transformer-based model, e.g., ESMFold and ProtBERT, has been utilized in protein structure prediction
and the evaluation of epitope stability under the mutational pressure.(14)
Such
capacity is especially useful in monitoring viruses such as influenza and SARS-CoV-2,
which mutate and change rapidly, requiring a prompt update of vaccination.
Reverse vaccinology can also be enhanced by IA-based platforms to identify
conserved regions among viral strains to speed up the development of
multi-epitope vaccines. Immunoinformatics and
structural biology, combined with AI, can maximize vaccines and shorten overall
development. AI enables sensitive and adaptable discussions on vaccine
pipelines to vaccine pipelines, lowering the development time and increasing
the effectiveness.(15)
AI
in resource-limited settings
AI provides a radical solution to diagnostic problems in
resource-constrained environments. Applications of mobile-based AI, including
smartphone-compatible biosensors and diagnostic solutions incorporated into a
cloud system, provide an opportunity to conduct decentralized testing without
requiring significantly advanced laboratory facilities.(3)
The tools are based on the use of lightweight models adapted to
low-bandwidth environments so that symptoms, images or test results can be
analyzed in real time. To give an example, AI-guided lateral flow assays have
been used in rural clinics to detect dengue and Zika viruses with high sensitivity.(16)
Nonetheless, ethical aspects of data ownership, informed consent, and
algorithmic bias must be addressed in order to promote equitable access and
trust to AI algorithms used for diagnostics. To implement these advancements on
a larger scale, collaborative frameworks between government, non-governmental
organizations, and tech developers are needed.(1,5)
Comparison
between traditional and AI-based viral diagnostics
Traditional
viral diagnostic methods such as viral culture, PCR, and serological assays have long served as
the backbone of clinical virology. These techniques offer high specificity and
are well-established in laboratory workflows. However, they often suffer from
limitations in speed, scalability, and real-time adaptability, especially during
emerging outbreaks.(17)
In
contrast, AI–driven approaches leverage computational models to analyze
heterogeneous biomedical data, enabling rapid detection, automated
classification, and predictive modeling. For instance, deep learning algorithms
can process chest radiographs to detect viral pneumonia patterns, while transformer-based
models analyze viral RNA sequences for mutation tracking and strain identification.(18)
In
addition, AI systems are capable of incorporating multimodal data (real-time
imaging and genomics along with clinical data) to deliver individualized
diagnostic results. This integrative capacity outshines conventional approach
whereby disjointed data flow is used. A real-time outbreak surveillance is also
supported through AI that provides predictive insights informing the control
measures taken to address a suspected outbreak.(13,19)
Although
current advantages are clear, AI-based diagnostics are fraught with challenges
that include algorithmic bias, data privacy issues, and regulation barriers.
Consequently, a hybrid approach that unites the predictability of the
conventional test with flexibility of AI could become the tool of the brightest
future.(20)
Challenges
in AI-based viral diagnostics
Although
AI has a potential revolutionizing impact on viral diagnostics, a sufficient
number of significant problems related to its use in the clinical and research
environment exist.
1.
Foundational AI models: need diverse, high-volume, well-labeled data to deliver
generalizable performance. Nonetheless, viral diagnostic data are subject to
limited recording, unbalanced classes, and inter-institutional and
inter-population variability. They may predispose overfitting and/or loss of
model reliability in practice.(21,22)
2.
Algorithmic bias and interpretability: most of the deep learning algorithms
work like a black box and hence very messy to interpret what they decide and
how they make these decisions. Such a lack of transparency should create
concerns regarding algorithmic bias, in cases where models are trained using
data sets that represent a disproportionate set of demographics or viral
strains. However, explainable AI (XAI) methods are on the rise to ameliorate
the issue, although these are rudimentary and are not scalable.(23,24,25)
3.
Regulatory and ethical constraints: deploying AI in clinical diagnostics
requires compliance with regulatory standards, such as Food and Drug
Administration or European Medicines Agency guidelines, and adherence to
ethical principles surrounding patient privacy, informed consent, and data
governance. These frameworks are still evolving and may lag behind
technological advancements, creating bottlenecks in clinical adoption.(26,27,28,29)
4.
Integration with existing clinical workflows: AI tools must be seamlessly
integrated into existing diagnostic pipelines without disrupting clinical
routines. This requires interoperability with electronic health records (EHRs),
user-friendly interfaces, and clinician training, all of which demand
significant infrastructural and educational investment.(28,29)
5.
Real-time adaptability and model updating: viral pathogens evolve rapidly,
requiring continuous model retraining and validation. Static models may fail to
detect emerging variants or novel strains, underscoring the need for dynamic
learning frameworks and real-time genomic surveillance.(30,31)
Future
trends and emerging applications in AI-based viral diagnostics
The
future of viral diagnostics is transforming into convergence of AI, real-time
genomic surveillance, and personalized medicine. Several emerging trends can
transform ways of viral infection detection and treatment.
1.
Combining protein language models (pLMs): new
developments in protein language models also provide proteins sensitivity to
language models, using which AI systems can read viral genomic sequences more
accurately than ever before. These models have the capability of predicting
viral evolution, antigenic drift, and functional mutations, providing real time
information of emerging variants.(26)
2.
Vaccines and therapeutics: AI is emerging as a technique that can be utilized
to speed up vaccine development through discovery of conserved viral epitopes
and modeling immune responses. This method assists in the development of
multi-epitope vaccines and personalized vaccines, in particular, to rapidly
mutated viruses.(16)
3.
Mobile and edge AI diagnostics: the AI models can be deployed on mobile
devices- improving access to diagnostics in resource-constrained or long-distance
locations. Such systems can be used to perform analysis of radiographic images
or biosensor data at their site of use, with less reliance on central
laboratories, thereby responding faster in the case of an outbreak.(31)
4.
Predictive epidemiology and outbreak forecasting: AI-driven models are being
integrated into public health platforms to forecast viral spread, identify
hotspots, and simulate intervention strategies. This predictive capability
enhances preparedness and resource allocation during epidemics.(27)
5.
Ethical AI and federated learning: to address privacy and data-sharing
concerns, federated learning frameworks are being adopted. These models allow
decentralized training across institutions without compromising patient
confidentiality, paving the way for ethically robust AI deployment.(28)
Conclusions
AI
is a paradigm shift in viral diagnostics due to its enhanced capabilities
compared to traditional methods in terms of speed, scale and multi-source data
analytics. Intelligent models have proven diagnostic accuracy in the medical
applications of medical imaging, genomic analysis, and vaccine design, and have
even outperformed clinical experts in some cases in particular, during epidemic
emergencies or in resource-poor settings. Although these have several benefits,
there are still areas of major concern when it comes to adopting these
technologies fully, namely data quality, the interpretability of models, and
regulatory and ethical validation. The implementation of AI in clinical
practice would have to be a strong knowledge-based and regulatory framework to
provide patient safety and accuracy of results. The future of diagnostics lies
in the creation of explainable models, developing the remaining training
dataset to reflect more geographic and biological diversity, and establishing
effective lines of communication between the creators of AI and health
authorities, to work collaboratively in defense of human well-being. A hybrid
approach that combines traditional methods with modern algorithms may prove to
be the most adaptable and beneficial strategy for addressing the increasing
challenges posed by viral threats.
References
1.
Mahony JB. Detection of respiratory viruses by molecular methods. Clin
Microbiol Rev. 2008;21(4):716–47. doi:
https://10.1128/CMR.00037-07.
2.
Marques M, Almeida A, Pereira H. The Medicine Revolution Through Artificial
Intelligence: Ethical Challenges of Machine Learning Algorithms in
Decision-Making. Cureus. 2024;16(9):e69405.
doi: https://10.7759/cureus.69405.
3. Barański J. Intelligent revolution in medicine - the
application of artificial intelligence (ai) in medicine: overview, benefits,
and challenges. Przegl Epidemiol. 2024;78(3):287-302.
doi: https://10.32394/pe/194484.
4.
Ali HH, Ali HM, Ali HM, Ali MA, Zaky AF, Touk AA, et al. The Role and Limitations of Artificial
Intelligence in Combating Infectious Disease Outbreaks. Cureus.
2025;17(1):e77070. doi:
https://10.7759/cureus.77070.
5. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of
human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):44–56. doi: https://10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7.
6.
Reta DH, Tessema TS, Ashenef
AS, Desta AF, Labisso WL, Gizaw
ST, et al. Molecular and Immunological Diagnostic Techniques of Medical
Viruses. Int J Microbiol. 2020;2020:8832728. doi: https://10.1155/2020/8832728.
7. Komasawa N, Yokohira M.
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Medical Education: A Narrative
Review of the Challenges and Possibilities for Future Professionalism. Cureus. 2025;17(6):e86316. doi:
https://10.7759/cureus.86316.
8.
Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A,
Chu DK, et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time
RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(3):2000045. doi: https://10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045.
9. Scohy A, Anantharajah A, Bodéus M, Kabamba-Mukadi B, Verroken A, Rodriguez-Villalobos H. Low performance of
rapid antigen detection test as frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis. J
Clin Virol. 2020;129:104455.
doi: https://10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104455.
10.
Wang L, Lin ZQ, Wong A. COVID-Net: a tailored deep convolutional neural network
design for detection of COVID-19 cases from chest X-ray images. Sci Rep.
2020;10(1):19549. doi:
https://10.1038/s41598-020-76550-z.
11.
Abdulkareem M, Petersen SE. The Promise of AI in
Detection, Diagnosis, and Epidemiology for Combating COVID-19: Beyond the Hype.
Front Artif Intell. 2021;4:652669. doi:
https://10.3389/frai.2021.652669.
12.
Shiaelis N, Tometzki A, Peto L, McMahon A, Hepp C,
Bickerton E, et al. Virus Detection and Identification in Minutes Using
Single-Particle Imaging and Deep Learning. ACS Nano. 2023;17(1):697-710. doi: https://10.1021/acsnano.2c10159.
13.
Senthilraja M. Application of Artificial Intelligence
to Address Issues Related to the COVID-19 Virus. SLAS Technol.
2021;26(2):123-6. doi: https://10.1177/2472630320983813.
14.
Zhao S, Xu M, Lin C, Zhang W, Li D, Peng Y, et al. AI-driven comprehensive
SERS-LFIA system: improving virus automated diagnostics through SERS image
recognition and deep learning. Biosensors. 2025;15(7):458. doi:
https://10.3390/bios15070458.
15.
Dawood AA. Dampening of proteomics activity associated with the COVID-19
patients afflicted with asthma based on gene expression pattern. J Microbiol
Epidemiol Immunol. 2024;101(1):133–42. doi:
https://10.36233/0372-9311-399.
16.
Theijeswini R, Basu S,
Swetha RG, Tharmalingam J, Ramaiah S, Calaivanane R, et al. Prophylactic and therapeutic measures
for emerging and re-emerging viruses: artificial intelligence and machine
learning—the key to a promising future. Health Technol. 2024;14:251–61.
doi: https://10.1007/s12553-024-00816-z.
17.
Dawood A. Streptococcus pneumoniae in Nineveh Province: A Comprehensive
Infection Survey and Public Health Implications. J Health Sci Med Res. 2025;
43(6):1-8. doi: https://10.31584/jhsmr.20251267.
18.
Lytras S, Lamb KD, Ito J, Grove J, Yuan K, Sato K, et
al. Pathogen genomic surveillance and the AI revolution. J Virol. 2025;99(2):e0160124. doi: https://10.1128/jvi.01601-24.
19. Lin Y, Zhang Y, Sun
H, Jiang H, Zhao X, Teng X, et al. NanoDeep: a deep learning framework for nanopore
adaptive sampling on microbial sequencing. Brief Bioinform.
2023;25(1):bbad499. doi: https://10.1093/bib/bbad499.
20. Benaliouche H, Hafi
H, Bendjenna H, Alshaikh Z.
Toward AI-Driven cough sound analysis for respiratory disease diagnosis. IEEE
Access. 2025;13:92554‑68. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3572202.
21.
Padhi A, Agarwal A, Saxena SK, Katoch
CDS. Transforming clinical virology with AI, machine learning and deep
learning: a comprehensive review and outlook. Virusdisease.
2023;34(3):345-55. doi: https://10.1007/s13337-023-00841-y.
22.
Sarantopoulos A, Mastori Kourmpani
C, Yokarasa AL, Makamanzi
C, Antoniou P, Spernovasilis N, Tsioutis
C. Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Disease Clinical Practice: An Overview
of Gaps, Opportunities, and Limitations. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024;9(10):228. doi: https://10.3390/tropicalmed9100228.
23.
Souf S. Recent advances in diagnostic testing for
viral infections. Biosci Horiz.
2016;9:hzw010. doi:
https://10.1093/biohorizons/hzw010.
24.
Shriwas PK, Sundaravadivazhagan
B, Patil YM. Role of artificial intelligence in diagnosis of viral infection.
In: Chatterjee JM, Sujatha R, Saxena SK, editors. Artificial Intelligence,
Telehealth, and Telemedicine in Medical Virology. Singapore: Springer; 2025. p.
31–51.
25.
Hudu SA, Alshrari AS, Abu-Shoura EJI, Osman A, Jimoh AO. A
Critical Review of the Prospect of Integrating Artificial Intelligence in
Infectious Disease Diagnosis and Prognosis. Interdiscip
Perspect Infect Dis. 2025;2025:6816002.
doi: https://10.1155/ipid/6816002.
26.
Jeyaraman M, Balaji S, Jeyaraman
N, Yadav S. Unraveling the Ethical Enigma: Artificial Intelligence in
Healthcare. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e43262.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.43262.
27.
Aravazhi PS, Gunasekaran P, Benjamin NZY, Thai A,
Chandrasekar KK, Kolanu ND, et al. The integration of
artificial intelligence into clinical medicine: Trends, challenges, and future
directions. Dis Mon. 2025;71(6):101882. doi: https://10.1016/j.disamonth.2025.
28.
Mohsin Khan M, Shah N, Shaikh N, Thabet A, Alrabayah T, Belkhair S. Towards
secure and trusted AI in healthcare: A systematic review of emerging
innovations and ethical challenges. Int J Med Inform. 2025;195:105780.
doi: https://10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105780.
29.
Shang Z, Chauhan V, Devi K, Patil S. Artificial Intelligence, the Digital
Surgeon: Unravelling Its Emerging Footprint in Healthcare - The Narrative
Review. J Multidiscip Healthc.
2025;17:4011-22. doi: https://10.2147/JMDH.S482757.
30.
Samathoti P, Kumarachari
RK, Bukke SPN, Rajasekhar ESK, Jaiswal AA, Eftekhari Z. The role of nanomedicine and artificial
intelligence in cancer health care: individual applications and emerging
integrations-a narrative review. Discov Oncol.
2025;16(1):697. doi:
https://10.1007/s12672-025-02469-4.
31.
Dawood A, Altobje M, Alrassam
Z. Molecular Docking of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein with
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme II. Mikrobiol Z. 2021; 83(2):82-92. doi: https://10.15407/microbiolj83.02.082.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of
interest.
Author’s contributions
Ali Adel Dawood: development of the idea and overall structure, review the literature, critical
analysis of conventional diagnostic techniques (viral culture, PCR, serological
tests), writing of sections related to the synthesis of results, discussion,
and conclusions, editing and linguistic correction.
Ahmed Mohammed Hayawi:
literature analysis and synthesis of the recent developments in artificial
intelligence and the purpose of viral diagnostic; writing of sections on
convolutional neural networks, transformer-based models and multimodal
integration; comparative analysis of traditional and AI-based systems;
discussion of limitations such as data quality, algorithmic bias or regulatory
compliance; contribution to the recommendation and future directions.
All authors reviewed and approved the final
version of this manuscript for publication.
* Department of Anatomy, Al-Batool College
of Medicine, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.